Lemur has an authorization bypass in StrictRolePermission / AuthorityCreatorPermission
위협 신호 · CVSS · EPSS · KEV
이론적 심각도 점수
예측 데이터 없음
실측 악용 기록 없음
2주 이내 패치 — 우선 조치 대상
CVSS 벡터 · 메트릭
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H상세 설명
Summary
StrictRolePermission and AuthorityCreatorPermission in lemur/auth/permissions.py call flask_principal.Permission.__init__() with zero Needs when their config flags are unset. Both flags defaulted to False in code prior to the fix, so this was the state of any Lemur install that hadn't explicitly opted in.
Flask-Principal's Permission.allows() returns True whenever self.needs is empty. The .can() gate therefore passes for every authenticated identity, including the lowest-privilege role Lemur ships (read-only).
A user holding only read-only can create root Certificate Authorities, create and edit notifications (an SSRF sink), create domain entries, and upload arbitrary certificates. These classes are the sole authorization check on those endpoints.
Root Cause
1# lemur/auth/permissions.py 2class AuthorityCreatorPermission(Permission): 3 def __init__(self): 4 requires_admin = current_app.config.get("ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION", False) 5 if requires_admin: 6 super().__init__(RoleNeed("admin")) 7 else: 8 super().__init__() # empty Need set 9 10class StrictRolePermission(Permission):11 def __init__(self):12 strict_role_enforcement = current_app.config.get("LEMUR_STRICT_ROLE_ENFORCEMENT", False)13 if strict_role_enforcement:14 needs = [RoleNeed("admin"), RoleNeed("operator")]15 super().__init__(*needs)16 else:17 super().__init__() # empty Need setflask_principal.Permission.allows() (upstream, v0.4.0):
1def allows(self, identity): 2 if self.needs and not self.needs.intersection(identity.provides): 3 return False 4 ... 5 return TrueWhen self.needs == set(), the first guard is falsy and is skipped. excludes is also empty, so allows() returns True for any identity. AuthenticatedResource (the parent class for these views) sets method_decorators = [login_required], which checks authentication only, no role. So the permission .can() is the only authorization layer in front of these endpoints.
Affected Endpoints
Views whose only authorization check is StrictRolePermission().can() or AuthorityCreatorPermission().can():
| Method | Path | Source |
|---|---|---|
| POST | /api/1/authorities | lemur/authorities/views.py:231 |
| POST | /api/1/certificates/upload | lemur/certificates/views.py:651 |
| POST | /api/1/pending_certificates/<id>/upload | lemur/pending_certificates/views.py:545 |
| POST | /api/1/notifications | lemur/notifications/views.py:227 |
| PUT/DEL | /api/1/notifications/<id> | lemur/notifications/views.py:370,384 |
| POST | /api/1/domains | lemur/domains/views.py:131 |
POST /api/1/authorities is gated by AuthorityCreatorPermission().can() and StrictRolePermission().can(); both have empty Needs by default. The other rows are gated by StrictRolePermission().can() alone.
Note on scope: PUT /api/1/authorities/<id> also references StrictRolePermission, but its gate is AuthorityPermission(...).can() and StrictRolePermission().can(). AuthorityPermission is constructed with non-empty Needs (RoleNeed("admin") plus authority-scoped needs), so that endpoint is not bypassable by a read-only user and is excluded from this report.
Impact
A user holding only the read-only role can:
- Create root Certificate Authorities. CA cert and private key are persisted in Lemur's DB with the attacker as owner. Any internal trust store that pins Lemur-managed roots can now be signed against by the attacker.
- Upload arbitrary certificates via
/certificates/upload, including attacker-supplied keys with destinations such as AWS push. - Create or modify notifications, which reach an SSRF sink (see related finding F3, Slack notification webhook).
- Mark arbitrary domains as
sensitive, manipulating Lemur's domain registry and the cert-issuance approval path.
Combined with any low-privilege credential leak (phished employee, leaked SSO token) or insider access, this is a pivot from "any authenticated identity" to control of the PKI issuance plane.
Remediation
The config flag defaults for ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION and LEMUR_STRICT_ROLE_ENFORCEMENT were changed from False to True. Restrictive role enforcement is now active on all default installs without requiring explicit configuration.
1class AuthorityCreatorPermission(Permission): 2 def __init__(self): 3 requires_admin = current_app.config.get("ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION", True) 4 ... 5 6class StrictRolePermission(Permission): 7 def __init__(self): 8 strict_role_enforcement = current_app.config.get("LEMUR_STRICT_ROLE_ENFORCEMENT", True) 9 ...Note: The opt-out branches (empty Needs) remain in the code. Operators who explicitly set ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION = False or LEMUR_STRICT_ROLE_ENFORCEMENT = False in their config will reintroduce the bypass. These flags should be left unset or set to True.
AI 심층 분석
공격 시나리오 · 재현 가능한 PoC 페이로드 · 즉시 적용 가능한 차단 패치를 한 번에 받아 보세요. 보안 운영팀이 그대로 점검·티켓팅에 쓸 수 있는 형태로 정리해 드립니다.