Gitea: Token public-only scope bypassed on Limited-visibility owners (Repository + Package categories) — residual after CVE-2026-25714 / PR #37118
위협 신호 · CVSS · EPSS · KEV
이론적 심각도 점수
예측 데이터 없음
실측 악용 기록 없음
계획된 패치 주기 내 조치(60일 이내)
CVSS 벡터 · 메트릭
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N상세 설명
Summary
After PR #37118 / CVE-2026-25714
(fix: Unify public-only token filtering in API queries and repo access checks,
merged 2026-05-18, backport #37773 to 1.26.2 — the May 2026 unification pass
for public-only token filtering, reporter Medoedus per the 1.26.2 release notes),
the public-only PAT scope is still bypassable on Repository and Package
scope categories when the owner's Visibility = Limited (instance-internal).
The sibling Org / User / ActivityPub cases in the same checkTokenPublicOnly
switch correctly reject Limited owners via !Visibility.IsPublic(). The
Repository / Package cases use repo.IsPrivate or Owner.Visibility.IsPrivate(),
both of which return false for VisibleTypeLimited — so a public-only PAT
strictly exceeds anonymous reach on a Limited owner.
Tested on gitea/gitea:1.26.2. The decisive marker is that PR #37118's
unification IS applied in the version under test (User-category PROBE returns
403 "token scope is limited to public users"). Despite that, the
Repository-category PROBE on the same Limited owner with the same PAT returns
200 and serves content.
Affected entry points (4 spots)
| File:Line | Function | Affected surface |
|---|---|---|
routers/api/v1/api.go:292 | checkTokenPublicOnly Package case | API v1 packages |
routers/api/packages/api.go:76 | reqPackageAccess middleware | All 24 native package registries (/api/packages/<type>/...) |
services/context/api.go | TokenCanAccessRepo helper | All API v1 Repository-category endpoints — content, issues, PRs, releases, labels, milestones, etc. |
services/context/permission.go:32 | CheckTokenScopes (called via CheckRepoScopedToken) | Web download endpoints /raw, /media, /attachments. LFS routes (services/lfs/server.go:470/472, services/lfs/locks.go:62/151/216/284) also chain through this helper. |
All four sinks check repo.IsPrivate or Owner.Visibility.IsPrivate() only.
VisibleTypeLimited falls through.
1// modules/structs/visible_type.go 2func (vt VisibleType) IsPrivate() bool { return vt == VisibleTypePrivate } // line 39-40 3func (vt VisibleType) IsLimited() bool { return vt == VisibleTypeLimited } // line 33-34Same-file evidence (routers/api/v1/api.go:246-299 after PR #37118)
1case auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization: 2 orgPrivate := ... && !ctx.Org.Organization.Visibility.IsPublic() // !IsPublic ✓ 3case auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser: 4 if ... && !ctx.ContextUser.Visibility.IsPublic() { ... } // !IsPublic ✓ 5case auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryActivityPub: 6 if ... && !ctx.ContextUser.Visibility.IsPublic() { ... } // !IsPublic ✓ 7 8case auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryPackage: 9 if ctx.Package != nil && ctx.Package.Owner.Visibility.IsPrivate() { // IsPrivate ONLY ✗10 ctx.APIError(http.StatusForbidden, "token scope is limited to public packages")11 return12 }TokenCanAccessRepo (services/context/api.go) reduces to !repo.IsPrivate:
1// A public-only token cannot reach a private repo; any other token is unrestricted by this check. 2func (ctx *APIContext) TokenCanAccessRepo(repo *repo_model.Repository) bool { 3 return repo == nil || !ctx.PublicOnly || !repo.IsPrivate 4}CheckTokenScopes (services/context/permission.go:32):
1if publicOnly && repo != nil && repo.IsPrivate { 2 ctx.HTTPError(http.StatusForbidden) 3 return 4}PoC (Docker e2e VERIFIED on gitea/gitea:1.26.2, 2026-06-05)
Full script in the report (run-poc.sh). Setup:
- Create user
limuser.PATCH /api/v1/admin/users/limuserwith body
{"visibility":"limited", ...}— response confirms"visibility":"limited". - Upload a generic package as
limuser:
PUT /api/packages/limuser/generic/secretpkg/1.0.0/secret.txtwith body
secret-content-internal-only→201. - Create user
attacker. - Mint PAT for
attackerwithscopes=["read:package","read:user","read:repository","public-only"].
Result on gitea/gitea:1.26.2 — nine PROBEs:
1PROBE A (download package via attacker PAT) 2 HTTP=200 Body: secret-content-internal-only 3 4PROBE C (read README of limuser's PUBLIC repo) 5 HTTP=200 Body: {"name":"README.md", ...} 6 7PROBE F (sanity — User category, same PAT, same owner) 8 HTTP=403 Body: {"message":"token scope is limited to public users"} 9 10PROBE G (Repository category, same PAT, same owner)11 HTTP=200 Body: {"name":"README.md", ...} ← bypass12 13PROBE H (list limuser's repos, User category)14 HTTP=403 Body: {"message":"token scope is limited to public users"}15 16PROBE M (git HTTPS smart protocol — info/refs)17 HTTP=200 Body: 001e# service=git-upload-pack ... HEAD ... ← full clone enabled18 19PROBE N (write attempt: POST contents/hacked.txt)20 HTTP=403 Body: {"message":"user should have a permission to write to the target branch"}21 Integrity:N confirmed22 23PROBE O (Limited ORG — same bypass class)24 Org category : HTTP=403 {"message":"token scope is limited to public orgs"}25 Repo category : HTTP=200 README content ← bypass26 27Anonymous baseline (no auth) on every above endpoint: HTTP=401/404Gitea's own server error string in PROBE F / H / O — "token scope is limited
to public users" / "public orgs" — is the explicit declaration of intent.
Repository / Package category violates that intent on the same Limited owner.
Why this is not a duplicate of CVE-2026-25714
CVE-2026-25714 / PR #37118 (the May 2026 unification pass for public-only token
filtering, merged 2026-05-18, backported to 1.26.2 via PR #37773) realigned
checkTokenPublicOnly's Org / User / ActivityPub cases on !Visibility.IsPublic()
and introduced the TokenCanAccessRepo helper for the Repository / Issue /
Notification cases.
PROBE F on 1.26.2 returns 403 "token scope is limited to public users" for
the User category — i.e. PR #37118's unification IS in effect on the version
under test. The Repository / Package leak occurs after that fix; the Limited
gap is the next residual issue on the same hygiene effort (the Package case was
not touched, and TokenCanAccessRepo reduces to !repo.IsPrivate without
consulting owner visibility), not the same bug.
Suggested fix (4 spots, 1-line shape each)
1// routers/api/v1/api.go:292 (checkTokenPublicOnly Package case) 2- if ctx.Package != nil && ctx.Package.Owner.Visibility.IsPrivate() { 3+ if ctx.Package != nil && !ctx.Package.Owner.Visibility.IsPublic() { 4 5// routers/api/packages/api.go:76 (reqPackageAccess middleware) 6- if ctx.Package != nil && ctx.Package.Owner.Visibility.IsPrivate() { 7+ if ctx.Package != nil && !ctx.Package.Owner.Visibility.IsPublic() { 8 9// services/context/api.go (TokenCanAccessRepo helper)10- return repo == nil || !ctx.PublicOnly || !repo.IsPrivate11+ return repo == nil || !ctx.PublicOnly ||12+ (!repo.IsPrivate && repo.Owner != nil && repo.Owner.Visibility.IsPublic())13 14// services/context/permission.go:32 (CheckTokenScopes)15- if publicOnly && repo != nil && repo.IsPrivate {16+ if publicOnly && repo != nil &&17+ (repo.IsPrivate || (repo.Owner != nil && !repo.Owner.Visibility.IsPublic())) {This aligns the Repository / Package categories with the User / Org / ActivityPub
siblings already shipped in PR #37118.
Reporter
JebeenLee
AI 심층 분석
공격 시나리오 · 재현 가능한 PoC 페이로드 · 즉시 적용 가능한 차단 패치를 한 번에 받아 보세요. 보안 운영팀이 그대로 점검·티켓팅에 쓸 수 있는 형태로 정리해 드립니다.