Kestrel
대시보드로 돌아가기
CVE-2026-74700HIGH· 7.8MITRENVD대응게시일: 2026. 08. 22.수정일: 2026. 08. 25.CNA: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67Received

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: cls_api: Always acquire rtnl_lock when destroying locked cla

위협 신호 · CVSS · EPSS · KEV

정기 패치· 높은 악용 신호 없음
CVSS
7.8high

이론적 심각도 점수

EPSS
0.1%상위 97.5%

30일 내 악용 확률 예측

KEV
미등재

실측 악용 기록 없음

권장 대응 기한차기 업그레이드 시CISA SSVC 기준

별도 긴급 패치 불필요 — 정기 시스템 업그레이드 주기에 맞춰 조치

완전 장악· KEV 미등재 · 자동화 어려움 · 완전 장악 · 내부 한정

CVSS 벡터 · 메트릭

악용 경로
공격 벡터로컬
공격 복잡도낮음
필요 권한낮음
사용자 상호작용불필요
범위불변
영향
기밀성 영향높음
무결성 영향높음
가용성 영향높음
버전별 점수
CVSS 3.17.8HIGH· 악용성 1.8· 영향도 5.9
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

상세 설명

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/sched: cls_api: Always acquire rtnl_lock when destroying locked classifiers

Another challenge with unlocked filters.
There is a short window in tc_new_tfilter where a tcf_proto can be found
and briefly referenced by a totally unrelated, unlocked classifier's request
and cause a race.

Feng created a poc which created this race with two threads, one creating a
u32 filter and other a flower filter in the same chain/prio:

  1. Both threads enter tc_new_tfilter, both find the chain empty, both
    drop filter_chain_lock
  2. u32 finishes tcf_proto_create("u32") first, calls
    tcf_chain_tp_insert_unique() -> inserts u32_tp into the chain
  3. flower finishes tcf_proto_create("flower") later, calls
    tcf_chain_tp_insert_unique() -> tcf_chain_tp_find() now sees u32_tp
    already there, takes a reference on it, destroys flower's own tp_new
    and returns u32_tp to the caller.

Flower then hits the kind mismatch check (because it requested for kind
"flower" but tp->ops->kind is "u32") and goes through the errout path
which calls tcf_proto_put() on u32_tp. If the u32 thread has already
gone through its own errout (its change() call failed on the PoC's empty
options) and dropped its create and insert refs, flower's put is the
last one and drops u32_tp's refcnt to zero.

At this point tp->ops->destroy() runs in a context that never took
rtnl_lock. When that happens, it might cause a UAF like the following
(illustrated by the PoC):

[ +0.000710] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in u32_init (net/sched/cls_u32.c:393)
[ +0.000281] Read of size 8 at addr ffff888120022f00 by task poc_feng_xue/524

Call Trace:
u32_init (net/sched/cls_u32.c:393)
tc_new_tfilter (net/sched/cls_api.c:2378)

Allocated by task 526:
u32_init (net/sched/cls_u32.c:378)
tc_new_tfilter (net/sched/cls_api.c:2378)

Freed by task 522:
kfree
u32_destroy (net/sched/cls_u32.c:662)
tcf_proto_destroy (net/sched/cls_api.c:446)
tcf_proto_put (net/sched/cls_api.c:459)
tc_new_tfilter (net/sched/cls_api.c:2459)

Fix this by having tcf_proto_destroy() take rtnl_lock around
tp->ops->destroy() for locked classifiers whenever rtnl is not held.

To explain why I used a temp variable "not_lockless" I'd like to point to a
semi-related note on rtnl_held vs TCF_PROTO_OPS_DOIT_UNLOCKED (adding here
for future cleanup if deemed necessary):
The rtnl_held parameter and the TCF_PROTO_OPS_DOIT_UNLOCKED flag are
redundant sources of truth for whether rtnl_lock is held. Among the nine
classifier destroy(..rtnl_held..) callbacks, only flower consults the
rtnl_held parameter which it propagates to tc_setup_cb_destroy()
and tc_setup_cb_call(). The other eight (u32, flow, bpf, cgroup, route, basic,
fw, mall) ignore it entirely;-> those that call tc_setup_cb_destroy()
(u32, bpf, mall) hardcode true always instead of forwarding the parameter.

A future cleanup should remove the rtnl_held parameter from the destroy callback
signature entirely and have callers rely solely on their knowledge whether
they are running in an unlocked context.

AI 심층 분석

공격 시나리오 · 재현 가능한 PoC 페이로드 · 즉시 적용 가능한 차단 패치를 한 번에 받아 보세요. 보안 운영팀이 그대로 점검·티켓팅에 쓸 수 있는 형태로 정리해 드립니다.