GitPython: Incomplete unsafe_git_revision_options denylist omits --contents/-S, enabling arbitrary file read via Repo.blame()
위협 신호 · CVSS · EPSS · KEV
이론적 심각도 점수
30일 내 악용 확률 예측
실측 악용 기록 없음
계획된 패치 주기 내 조치(60일 이내)
CVSS 벡터 · 메트릭
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N상세 설명
Summary
Repo.blame() / Repo.blame_incremental() guard forwarded revision options against unsafe_git_revision_options, but that denylist only contains the file-WRITE options --output/-o. git blame also honors --contents <file> and -S <file>, which cause the file's lines to be echoed into the blame result — an arbitrary file READ. Neither option is in the denylist, so a caller-influenced revision value of --contents=<path> passes the guard and leaks file contents. This is a distinct sink-option and impact class (READ) from GHSA-956x-8gvw-wg5v (which addressed the blame --output WRITE), directly analogous to GHSA-539m-9xh6-q6rr (archive READ gap accepted separately from the archive write/exec advisory).
Root Cause
unsafe_git_revision_options = ["--output","-o"] (git/repo/base.py:188). The rev string is passed to _option_candidates([rev], kwargs) and placed BEFORE the -- separator (base.py:841). The canonical name of --contents=... is contents, which is not on the denylist, so no UnsafeOptionError is raised. The trailing -- protects only the pathspec, not the option before the revision.
Impact
Arbitrary local file read at the privileges of the host process; the file's line contents appear in the blame result returned to the caller. Pure VALUE control (the caller forwards a user-influenced revision string). Default allow_unsafe_options=False.
Proof of Concept
1result = repo.blame("--contents=/etc/passwd", "a.txt") 2# result rows carry the victim file's line textAttack Chain
- Entry: app calls
repo.blame(rev, file)with attackerrev="--contents=/etc/passwd"(or kwargcontents="/etc/passwd", or-S). - Check:
Git.check_unsafe_options(_option_candidates([rev,...], kwargs), unsafe_git_revision_options)@ base.py:841. Guard: denylist =["--output","-o"]only. Bypass proof: canonical namecontents∉ denylist → no error. - Sink:
self.git.blame(rev, "--", file, p=True, ...). argv (observed):['git','blame','-p','--contents=<secret>','HEAD','--','a.txt']. - Impact: blame result rows carry the victim file's line text.
Bypass Evidence
Independently reproduced (independent test harness, default allow_unsafe_options=False): blame('--contents=<secret>','a.txt') → guard PASSED; result rows = ['GATE_SECRET_LINE_A','GATE_SECRET_LINE_B']. Control: blame('--output=…') still BLOCKED (guard active on this path). -S kwarg argv also reaches git unguarded.
Affected Versions
GitPython <= 3.1.58 (denylist present verbatim on the latest release tag).
Suggested Fix
Prefer an allowlist of blame options; at minimum add --contents/-S (and any other path-taking blame options) to unsafe_git_revision_options, and make the membership rule "the option takes a filesystem path" rather than "the option writes output".
Reported by zx (Jace) — GitHub: @manus-use
AI 심층 분석
공격 시나리오 · 재현 가능한 PoC 페이로드 · 즉시 적용 가능한 차단 패치를 한 번에 받아 보세요. 보안 운영팀이 그대로 점검·티켓팅에 쓸 수 있는 형태로 정리해 드립니다.
참고 자료 5
링크 내용 불러오는 중…