Kestrel
대시보드로 돌아가기
CVE-2026-79675CRITICAL· 9.8MITRENVDGHSA대응게시일: 2026. 08. 25.수정일: 2026. 09. 01.

NLTK: JVM argument injection bypass via per-call options in the NLTK Stanford wrappers (incomplete fix of CVE-2026-12841)

위협 신호 · CVSS · EPSS · KEV

시급 검토· 이론 심각도 Critical
CVSS
9.8critical

이론적 심각도 점수

EPSS
0.4%상위 64.1%

30일 내 악용 확률 예측

KEV
미등재

실측 악용 기록 없음

권장 대응 기한3일 이내CISA SSVC 기준

즉시(3일 이내) 패치 — 최우선 대응

자동화 가능완전 장악외부 노출· KEV 미등재 · 자동화 가능 · 완전 장악 · 외부 노출

CVSS 벡터 · 메트릭

악용 경로
공격 벡터네트워크
공격 복잡도낮음
필요 권한불필요
사용자 상호작용불필요
범위불변
영향
기밀성 영향높음
무결성 영향높음
가용성 영향높음
버전별 점수
CVSS 3.19.8CRITICAL
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

상세 설명

Vulnerability

The fix for CVE-2026-12841 (CWE-88, JVM argument injection) added _validate_java_options() to block dangerous JVM flags such as -agentlib, -agentpath, -javaagent, -Xrunjdwp, and @argfile references. However, the validation is only applied when setting global options via config_java(). The java() function's per-call options parameter -- added by PR #3683 (CVE-2026-12615 fix) -- passes options directly to subprocess.Popen without calling _validate_java_options().

All four Stanford Java wrapper classes accept user-supplied java_options and route them through the unvalidated per-call path, bypassing the CVE-2026-12841 fix entirely.

Root Cause

In nltk/internals.py, the java() function (line 128) accepts an options keyword argument. When options is not None, it is converted to a list and prepended to the JVM command (lines 211-217) without any validation:

bash
1# nltk/internals.py, lines 211-217 (HEAD)
2if options is None:
3 java_options = _java_options # validated by config_java()
4else:
5 if isinstance(options, str):
6 options = options.split()
7 java_options = list(options) # NO validation
8cmd = [_java_bin] + java_options + cmd

Compare with config_java() (line 92) which does validate:

bash
1# nltk/internals.py, lines 122-123
2_validate_java_options(options)
3_java_options[:] = options

The four affected wrapper classes store user-supplied java_options without validation and pass them through the unvalidated per-call path:

  1. GenericStanfordParser (nltk/parse/stanford.py): constructor parameter at line 39, stored at line 78, passed at lines 247 and 256
  2. StanfordTagger (nltk/tag/stanford.py): constructor parameter at line 51, stored at line 79, passed at line 118
  3. StanfordTokenizer (nltk/tokenize/stanford.py): constructor parameter at line 43, stored at line 66, passed at line 109
  4. StanfordSegmenter (nltk/tokenize/stanford_segmenter.py): constructor parameter at line 68, stored at line 117, passed at line 337

Proof of Concept

python
1from nltk.internals import config_java, java, _validate_java_options
2
3# 1. The global config_java() path correctly blocks dangerous flags:
4try:
5 config_java(options=["-agentpath:/tmp/evil.so"])
6except ValueError as e:
7 print(f"config_java blocked: {e}") # blocked as expected
8
9# 2. The per-call options path does NOT block them:
10# (Would execute if Java were installed)
11# java(["SomeClass"], classpath=".", options=["-agentpath:/tmp/evil.so"])
12# This passes "-agentpath:/tmp/evil.so" directly to subprocess.Popen
13
14# 3. Stanford wrapper classes pass through without validation:
15# from nltk.parse.stanford import StanfordParser
16# parser = StanfordParser(java_options="-agentpath:/tmp/evil.so")
17# parser.parse(...) # dangerous flag reaches JVM
18
19# Verify the gap directly:
20dangerous_opts = ["-agentpath:/tmp/evil.so"]
21try:
22 _validate_java_options(dangerous_opts)
23 print("Would have been caught")
24except ValueError:
25 print("Correctly rejected by _validate_java_options()")
26
27# But java() itself never calls _validate_java_options():
28import inspect
29source = inspect.getsource(java)
30assert "_validate_java_options" not in source, "java() does not validate options"
31print("Confirmed: java() does not call _validate_java_options()")

Impact

An attacker who controls the java_options parameter to any NLTK Stanford wrapper class can inject arbitrary JVM flags, including:

  • -agentpath:/path/to/malicious.so -- loads a native agent, achieving arbitrary code execution
  • -javaagent:/path/to/malicious.jar -- loads a Java agent for bytecode manipulation
  • -agentlib:jdwp=transport=dt_socket,server=y,address=*:5005 -- enables remote debugging, allowing remote code execution
  • @/path/to/argfile -- expands an argument file, which can smuggle any of the above

This is exploitable in scenarios where NLTK is deployed as a service and java_options is derived from user input, configuration files, or environment variables. The PR #3647 commit message explicitly states the fix was intended to cover "StanfordSegmenter, and GenericStanfordParser" but the implementation only validates in config_java().

Suggested Fix

Add _validate_java_options() to the java() function's per-call options handling:

bash
1# nltk/internals.py, in the java() function
2if options is None:
3 java_options = _java_options
4else:
5 if isinstance(options, str):
6 options = options.split()
7 java_options = list(options)
8 _validate_java_options(java_options) # ADD THIS LINE
9cmd = [_java_bin] + java_options + cmd

This single-line addition closes the bypass for all four Stanford wrapper classes and any future callers of java(options=...).

AI tooling

AI assistance was used for the code audit and for drafting this report. The finding were manually verified against the project's source at the location cited above before reporting it, and the severity and impact assessment are the reporters.

AI 심층 분석

공격 시나리오 · 재현 가능한 PoC 페이로드 · 즉시 적용 가능한 차단 패치를 한 번에 받아 보세요. 보안 운영팀이 그대로 점검·티켓팅에 쓸 수 있는 형태로 정리해 드립니다.