Kestrel
대시보드로 돌아가기
CVE-2026-88013LOW· 3.7MITRENVDGHSA대응게시일: 2026. 09. 10.수정일: 2026. 09. 10.

rclone: http backend forwards custom/auth headers to a different host on redirect

Info-Disclosure

위협 신호 · CVSS · EPSS · KEV

정기 패치· 높은 악용 신호 없음
CVSS
3.7low

이론적 심각도 점수

EPSS

예측 데이터 없음

KEV
미등재

실측 악용 기록 없음

권장 대응 기한60일 이내CISA SSVC 기준

계획된 패치 주기 내 조치(60일 이내)

외부 노출· KEV 미등재 · 자동화 어려움 · 부분 영향 · 외부 노출

CVSS 벡터 · 메트릭

악용 경로
공격 벡터네트워크
공격 복잡도높음
필요 권한불필요
사용자 상호작용불필요
범위불변
영향
기밀성 영향낮음
무결성 영향없음
가용성 영향없음
버전별 점수
CVSS 3.13.7LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

상세 설명

Vulnerability Details

File: backend/http/http.go
Lines: 285 (client construction — no CheckRedirect), 505-510 (addHeaders, writes configured secret headers onto every request), 533-534 / 700-701 / 782-785 (f.httpClient.Do(req) used by List/stat/download)

Root Cause

The http backend lets a user attach arbitrary secret headers to every request via --http-headers/headers= (documented for authentication: '"Cookie","name=value","Authorization","xxx"'). The backend's HTTP client is built with fshttp.NewClient(ctx), which never sets http.Client.CheckRedirect, so it falls back to Go's stdlib default redirect policy.

Go's default policy only strips four header names (Authorization, Www-Authenticate, Cookie, Cookie2), and only when the redirect target's host differs from the original — every other configured header is copied to the redirect target unconditionally, regardless of host or scheme. Even the four protected names survive a same-host https://http:// downgrade, since Go only checks host equality, not scheme.

Any redirect response from the configured remote — whether from server compromise, an open redirect, a CDN/mirror failover to a different domain, or a malicious server from the start — causes rclone to resend every configured secret header (and, for a scheme downgrade, Authorization/Cookie in cleartext) to the new destination.

This is the exact vulnerability class already fixed for the s3 backend (9328763/7543a7a, GHSA-8mxv-9xhp-86h4 and the webdav backend (59b513b, GHSA-h4mf-4v27-hggj, wiring rest.RefuseHTTPSDowngradeRedirectFn). backend/http was not touched by either fix.

Vulnerable Code

text
1// backend/http/http.go:285
2client := fshttp.NewClient(ctx) // no CheckRedirect set
3...
4f.httpClient = client // used by readDir / NewObject / Object.Open
text
1// backend/http/http.go:505-510
2func addHeaders(req *http.Request, opt *Options) {
3 for i := 0; i < len(opt.Headers); i += 2 {
4 key := opt.Headers[i]
5 value := opt.Headers[i+1]
6 req.Header.Add(key, value)
7 }
8}

Attack Scenario

  1. User configures an http remote: url=https://good.example.com/files/, headers=X-Api-Key,SECRET-TOKEN.
  2. At some point good.example.com returns a redirect whose Location points at a different host (compromise, open redirect, CDN change, or malice from the start).
  3. User runs any operation (ls, cat, copy, mount, serve) against the remote.
  4. rclone follows the redirect with the default client and resends X-Api-Key: SECRET-TOKEN to the new, untrusted destination.
  5. The attacker's server captures the secret from the incoming request.

Impact

Exfiltration of API keys / bearer tokens / session cookies configured for one host, to any host the (trusted-at-configuration-time) remote later redirects to. All operations on the http backend (list, stat, download, mount, serve) are affected. No special rclone privileges or unusual user interaction are needed beyond a normal sync/list/copy once the redirect exists.

Dynamic Confirmation

Built rclone from source at cfdc9d0 (current master, v1.76.0-DEV) and configured:

text
1[testhttp]
2type = http
3url = http://127.0.0.1:9090/
4headers = X-Api-Key,SUPER-SECRET-TOKEN-abc123

Server A (port 9090, the "configured" host) 302-redirects every request to Server B (port 9091, a different host). Running rclone cat testhttp:file.txt caused Server B — which was never configured with any credential — to receive:

text
1Header: X-Api-Key: SUPER-SECRET-TOKEN-abc123
2Header: Referer: http://127.0.0.1:9090/file.txt

rclone printed Server B's response body as if it were the real file, confirming the full stat→redirect→download round trip leaks the header and trusts the redirect target.

Vulnerable Code / Fix

A minimal fix (implemented, tested, and verified to close the leak while preserving redirect functionality) wires the client to rest.RefuseHTTPSDowngradeRedirectFn (already used by webdav) and strips the configured opt.Headers on any cross-host redirect:

text
1client := fshttp.NewClient(ctx)
2client.CheckRedirect = redirectCheckFn(opt)
3...
4func redirectCheckFn(opt *Options) func(req *http.Request, via []*http.Request) error {
5 return func(req *http.Request, via []*http.Request) error {
6 if err := rest.RefuseHTTPSDowngradeRedirectFn(req, via); err != nil {
7 return err
8 }
9 if len(via) > 0 && req.URL.Host != via[0].URL.Host {
10 for i := 0; i < len(opt.Headers); i += 2 {
11 req.Header.Del(opt.Headers[i])
12 }
13 }
14 return nil
15 }
16}

A regression test (TestRedirectStripsHeadersOnHostChange) was added to backend/http/http_internal_test.go, confirmed to fail without the fix and pass with it. Full backend/http and lib/rest test suites pass with the fix applied. I have a fix branch ready to push to a private fork once this report is acknowledged.

Verification

Dynamically confirmed on rclone master @ cfdc9d0 (post v1.75.0) in a local test harness — see "Dynamic Confirmation" above. Fix verified to eliminate the leak via the same harness (secret header absent from Server B after the fix; functionality — file download via redirect — unaffected).

AI 심층 분석

공격 시나리오 · 재현 가능한 PoC 페이로드 · 즉시 적용 가능한 차단 패치를 한 번에 받아 보세요. 보안 운영팀이 그대로 점검·티켓팅에 쓸 수 있는 형태로 정리해 드립니다.