Kestrel
대시보드로 돌아가기
CVE-2026-89762UNKNOWNMITRENVD대응게시일: 2026. 09. 11.수정일: 2026. 09. 11.CNA: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67Received

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: apparmor: fix cred UAF caused by begin_current_label_crit_section() Ap

위협 신호 · CVSS · EPSS · KEV

정기 패치· 높은 악용 신호 없음
CVSS
unknown

이론적 심각도 점수

EPSS

예측 데이터 없음

KEV
미등재

실측 악용 기록 없음

권장 대응 기한60일 이내CISA SSVC 기준

계획된 패치 주기 내 조치(60일 이내)

외부 노출· KEV 미등재 · 자동화 어려움 · 부분 영향 · 외부 노출

CVSS 벡터 · 메트릭

CVSS 벡터 정보 없음

상세 설명

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

apparmor: fix cred UAF caused by begin_current_label_crit_section()

AppArmor's begin_current_label_crit_section() is a scary function called
from lots of LSM hooks (in particular VFS/socket-related ones) that checks
if the label referenced by the current creds is marked FLAG_STALE, and if
so, attempts to use aa_replace_current_label() to replace the creds with an
updated version that uses a new label.

The first problem with this is that it would directly lead to UAF of
struct cred if anything in the kernel takes a pointer to the current
creds and accesses these past a security hook invocation that replaces
creds, like so:

text
1const struct cred *cred = current_cred();
2alloc_file_pseudo(...);
3uid_t uid = cred->euid;

I don't know if anything in the kernel actually does this, but I think it
is very surprising that this pattern could lead to UAF.

The second problem is that things go wrong when aa_replace_current_label()
runs with overridden credentials. aa_replace_current_label() bails out if
current_cred() != current_real_cred() (mirroring the check in
proc_pid_attr_write()), but this check can't actually reliably detect
overridden credentials because the overridden creds can be the same as the
objective creds.

So in approximately the following scenario, things go wrong:

  1. task begins with <creds A> (as both objective and subjective creds),
    with refcount=2
  2. task grabs an extra reference on <creds A> for overriding
  3. task calls override_creds(<creds A>), which returns a pointer to the old
    subjective creds (<creds A>)
  4. task enters AppArmor LSM hook
  5. AppArmor checks that objective/subjective creds are equal
  6. AppArmor replaces both cred pointers with <creds B> and drops 2 refs on
    <creds A>
  7. task leaves AppArmor LSM hook
  8. task calls revert_creds(<creds A>)
  9. now task->cred is <creds A> while task->real_cred is <creds B>, but the
    task_struct logically holds two references to <creds B>
  10. another task drops the extra reference on <creds A> that was used for
    overriding, refcount drops to 0
  11. now task->real_cred points to freed creds

At this point, any access to current_cred() will be UAF.

I have a test case where I run aa-disable on a profile while a process
using that profile is blocked on splice() from a FUSE passthrough file into
a full pipe; after the profile update, the pipe becomes empty, splice()
resumes, the credentials go out of sync, and a subsequent getuid() syscall
results in a KASAN UAF splat.

To fix this, instead of directly replacing creds, do it via task_work that
will run at the end of the current syscall. (The point in time at which the
cred replacement happens should have no correctness impact; it is just a
performance optimization to avoid unnecessarily touching the refcount of
the new label.)

Note that AppArmor still performs direct cred replacements in the
sb_pivotroot LSM hook after this change, and that direct cred replacements
can still happen in VFS ->write() callbacks via proc_pid_attr_write().

There are two options for what to do with aa_dup_task_ctx(): Either
explicitly reset new->label_replacement_pending after the entire
aa_task_ctx has been copied, or switch to manually copying members over.
I am switching to manually copying members over because that should make
bugs more obvious.

AI 심층 분석

공격 시나리오 · 재현 가능한 PoC 페이로드 · 즉시 적용 가능한 차단 패치를 한 번에 받아 보세요. 보안 운영팀이 그대로 점검·티켓팅에 쓸 수 있는 형태로 정리해 드립니다.